Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

DPM 2010 - Protecting and Recovering SharePoint, Exchange and Files

 

Andrew Walman

22/02/2011

​Since the last post I wrote on DPM 2007, our environment has undergone an number of upgrades:

  • SharePoint 2007 is now 2010.
  • Exchange 2007 is now 2010 (we waited until DPM 2010 was released so we could protect Exchange 2010 straight away)
  • SQL 2005 servers have been replaced by 2008.
  • All of our servers now run Windows 2008 R2.

To ensure all the data we have in those new systems is protected, we had to upgrade our DPM 2007 server to 2010.

In-Place Upgrade - Not So Good

In an effort to retain disk-based recovery points, I took the (wrong) decision to do an in-place upgrade of our DPM 2007 server, which was running on Windows 2003 R2 x64. As DPM 2010 requires Windows 2008, the first job was to upgrade the operating system, which went comparitively smoothly, and DPM 2007 continued to function after the upgrade - so far, so good.

However, the second upgrade, from DPM 2007 to 2010, wasn't so smooth. Although this is a supported scenario, and DPM setup will walk you through the upgrade, something went wrong with ours. Everything looked OK - we were left with a working console, and the protection groups were all present and correct - but nothing was backing up, even with the updated agents. We raised a call with Microsoft PSS to help (it was a production system after all) but a after a few days of sending massive log files backward and forwards, decided the best way was just to run a fresh install of DPM 2010 and recreate the protection groups - must of the disk recovery points had already expired anyway, and would import the tapes. Perhaps if we just relied on disk-based protection, we would have pesevered, but that's the advantage of good old tape. We'll put the failed upgrade down to one upgrade too far...

Much Better 

Once up and running, DPM 2010 is well worth investing in. Its so much more polished than 2007, whilst still retaining the simplicity of the original. It's also far more reliable. I remember when we first started using 2007 in its RTM release, and needed almost constant attention to keep it up and running. Several service packs and hotfixes improved things a lot, but there would usually be at least one or two problems a week that required intervention.

Not so with 2010. Straight out of the box it just works. And looks after itself - if you let it, Consistency checks and recovery points running out of space are a thing of the past. And my personal bugbear with the old version, having to have individual space allocated to each protected SQL database - has now gone. We have many small databases that all need protecting, and before each one needed a few GBs each for recovery points  in DPM (the minimum allocation being 1.1GB), even when they only used a few MBs of storage. Now, SQL databases share DPM disk space, using it far more efficiently for many small databases.   

So DPM itself is a lot better - as well as the improvements in managing protection groups, the UI itself is a lot quicker, and it seems to handle more protected resources than the old one did on the same hardware. But the main reason we upgraded was to protect the new versions of its key workloads, SharePoint 2010 and Exchange 2010.

New Stuff

First SharePoint: With 2007, you had to use a recovery farm, running alongside your production farm, to recover files/sites back to the production farm. This meant you could recover just about anything easily, but maintaining that second farm was a pain, particularly if you only did restores once in a blue moon. Now (with DPM 2010 protecting SharePoint 2010) it's possible to restore using an "offline" content database - meaning you don't need a recovery farm. DPM just attaches and mounts the recovered database to your SQL server and SharePoint can read the DB without associating it to a SharePoint web application. Much better. Other than that, it's the same process as before for protecting SharePoint - you need to run configuresharepoint.exe on a farm server with the DPM agent etc.

Secondly, Exchange: Not much different here, other than DPM 2010 obviously supports the new Database groups avaialble in Exchange 2010. We've done a few restores now, and whether its individual items or an entire mailbox, its a doddle. Not had to do a full storage group recovery yet, but with DAG and DPM, I don't think that's ever likely without a full-on asteroid strike.

System Center Integration

Integration with System Center - both Operations Manager and Service Manager - is also a lot better now with the improved management pack that can use SLAs: instead of notifying about each recovery point failure (which with a few thousand a day going on can be irritating) - it only raises an alert (and therefore a SCSM incident) when the failures occur several times in a row.

Recommended

In summary, DPM 2010 is great. I really can't fault it, and its made managing our backups easy. If you have any of SharePoint, Exchange, Hyper-V, SQL, System Center - its the easiest backup/recovery I've ever come across.


 About us

Fuse Collaboration Services is a Cloud Solution Provider and Microsoft Gold Partner specialising in delivering SharePoint, Skype for Business, and Azure cloud-based solutions. Based in Northampton, UK.

Microsoft Gold Partner Logo showing 5 competencies

Read more

 Latest Tweets

 Latest Blog

 

 

‘We’d love you to stick around’. But stick around where?3728<p class="lead">Here at Fuse Collaboration Services both our personal and professional email inboxes are receiving a steady flow of emails from companies asking us to stay on their mailing lists. This is the most obvious and public aspect of the new GDPR that is currently being implemented.</p><p>There are a couple of positive side-effects from these new regulations, not least that by forcing you to opt in to mailing lists to make sure you are only receiving what you want to receive a company will really know how engaged you are, making your email address all the more valuable when it comes to marketing.</p><p>Companies have been responding to the GDPR changes by re-working their data management policies, but how much time is being put into how these policies can be enacted day-to-day, especially away from the aforementioned marketing email lists?</p><p>For example, if you have written a policy that says that emails are going to be stored for one year before deletion, how are you going to store them away from an active email server (thereby reducing the burden on a day-to-day server), or keep hold of them once a member of staff leaves? Or what happens if data is accidentally deleted by a member of staff?</p><p>Furthermore, data security is made all the more important as more and more companies opt for a flexible working approach where their staff can work from remote locations, such as home or (dare we say it) a high street coffee chain with its free Wi-Fi access.</p><p>Domestic or public internet access networks are unlikely to have the same levels of security as a company's, which makes it all the more important that any data transfer between a central hub and remote laptop is encrypted and has the latest security.</p><p>Chris Evans of Computer Weekly has highlighted <a href="https&#58;//www.computerweekly.com/feature/GDPR-brings-serious-implications-for-data-storage" target="_blank"> <span style="text-decoration&#58;underline;">five areas</span></a>&#160;which will impact the day-to-day work of the data storage manager under GDPR, including&#58;</p><ul><li>encryption; </li><li>detailed application-to-storage mapping;</li><li>security and audit; </li><li>validation of test and development requirements;</li><li>and collaborating closely with colleagues.</li></ul><p>Ultimately, you need to be able to give all your customers, clients, stakeholders and staff the confidence that their data and documents are stored securely, but also in a way that allows you to respond to data requests quickly and efficiently without having to wade through a mound of irrelevant information.</p><p>You also need to have the peace of mind that any deleted information can be recovered within your policy timetables, whether they be one year, five years, or longer than that.</p><p>There is also a danger that you could be sucked into a one-size-fits-all approach using policy and storage templates that have been designed for organisations that are in a different sector or are of a vastly different size to your own.</p><p>Fuse's data back-up and storage solutions tick all of the boxes you need to have that peace of mind to concentrate on your main business, namely growing as a company, while also being tailored to your specific needs.</p><p>Fuse uses a mixture of cloud-based packages to meet your requirements and allow your staff to access their relevant information <em>securely </em>regardless of where they are working. Our solutions are also easy to monitor by your in-house IT team, so that in the unlikely event of a data breach it can be identified, resolved and reported quickly.</p><div class="well well-lg"><p class="lead">Give us a call on 01604 797979 and we can have a chat about how you can make sure your data policy matches your day-to-day operations and requirements.</p></div> | Chris Wearmouth | 693A30232E777C6675736563735C632E776561726D6F757468 i:0#.w|fusecs\c.wearmouth16/05/2018 23:00:002018-05-16T23:00:00ZData security and rentention in a cloud based infrastructureData security in a cloud based infrastructure14/06/2018 09:56:102278htmlFalseaspx

 Contact us

Our address
12 Brookfield, Duncan Close
Moulton Park, Northampton
NN3 6WL
P: +44(0)1604 797979
Contact Us